Families often reach the same breaking point: a parent is clearly struggling, but insists nothing is wrong and refuses the very supports that would keep them safe. It might be a flat “no” to home care. A refusal to shower for weeks. A refusal to see a doctor, stop driving, or allow anyone to “interfere.” Sometimes the family has Powers of Attorney. Sometimes they do not. Either way, the emotional experience is the same: fear, frustration, and the exhausting feeling of watching someone you love self-sabotage.
Most families want a plan that reduces risk without turning their relationship into a battle (whether in a living room or a courtroom). The goal is often not “control.” It’s stability: fewer crises, less conflict, and a path toward care that the person will accept.
Why refusal happens (and why logic often fails)
Refusal is not always stubbornness, although it certainly can feel that way. Dementia and other cognitive impairments can affect insight, judgment, impulse control, and paranoia. The person may genuinely believe nothing is wrong. They may be protecting their dignity. They may feel embarrassed about bathing, defensive about money, or terrified of losing independence. When families respond with facts, the person often responds with more resistance.
This is why the ideal approach, in our experience, is not purely legal: it’s strategic.
Practical strategies that often work better than confrontation
In many cases, the fastest progress comes from changing how support is introduced.
1) Swap the “why” conversation for a “how” offer.
Instead of “You need home care,” try “Would mornings or afternoons be better for someone to help with laundry?” The smaller the decision, the easier it is to accept. Give binary choices where it is implied that a choice (accepting help) must be made.
2) Rename the service.
“Home care” is a loaded term. Many people are resistant to terms that make them feel old, sick or helpless. “A helper,” “a housekeeper,” or “someone to make meals” feels less threatening. The substance can be identical but the semantics change how they feel.
3) Use the right messenger.
Often the adult child is the worst person to persuade their parent. A family doctor, a trusted neighbor, a faith leader, or even the person’s hairdresser can sometimes accomplish in one conversation what a child can’t in ten.
4) Take baby steps and employ empathy at each of them.
If bathing is the major challenge, start with something adjacent, such as a sponge bath with full towel coverage by a PSW who they have first gotten to know. Ease the person into accepting help and do so in a way that makes them as physically and emotionally comfortable as possible.
5) Consider what motivates them and do so with positive framing.
With dementia, apathy can be a symptom and also a barrier to care. If the person lacks motivation, they might not internally feel driven to take care of themselves. However, some families find that clear, short-term external motivation is helpful. For example, "it's time to take a bath because we have church this afternoon" can be more persuasive than "you need to take a bath now, it's been three months, this isn't hygienic..."
The legal layer: what families can do when persuasion isn’t enough
Eventually, many families need legal structure—especially if money is being mismanaged, unsafe decisions are escalating, or the person is refusing basic care.
In Ontario, the two most common legal options are:
1) Powers of Attorney (POA)
A POA is the best tool when it exists and can be used properly. For property, it may allow an attorney to manage banking, bills, and finances. For personal care, it may allow an attorney to make health and care decisions when the person lacks capacity for that decision—and those decisions still have to follow Ontario’s consent rules.
Capacity can be decision-specific. The goal is not to remove all rights but to step in as needed when individuals are particularly vulernable and lack insight.
2) Guardianship
Guardianship can be necessary when there is no valid POA, when the existing attorney cannot act effectively, or when conflict or exploitation has made the status quo impossible. It can also be required when institutions need clear authority.
Guardianship must be sought only as a last resort. We therefore help families explore every reasonable alternative first.
The truth many families need to hear
Sometimes there is no perfect solution that preserves everyone’s feelings, rights and safety. Safety and autonomy can collide. The goal is to find the least intrusive option that actually works, and to do it in a way that keeps the peace as much as possible.
At Lisa Feldstein Law Office we help families make sense of this messy middle: when the person is declining, refusing help, and the family is carrying the burden. The work is part legal, part practical, and always compassionate.
This post is for general information and is not legal advice. Families facing urgent safety concerns should seek individualized guidance.
through a difficult time?
